🔗 Share this article

An informant has told the Afghan leak inquiry that the UK left behind classified devices allowing the militant group to identify local individuals who collaborated with western forces.

Information Leak Puts Numerous at Risk

The source, known as Person A, explained that people concerned by the security lapse were instructed to change residences and alter their contact details to protect themselves from the Taliban.

Members of Parliament are investigating official management of a massive leak of private information involving almost nineteen thousand Afghans who had requested to come to the United Kingdom to escape militant rule.

How the Leak Was Discovered

An electronic document including their personal data, including names, contact details and sometimes relative details, was inadvertently disclosed by a worker stationed at British military command in early 2022.

The breach became known only in August 2023, when identities of multiple applicants who had applied to relocate to Britain appeared on Facebook.

Regime's Resources

It appears there is a false assumption that the Taliban lack comparable resources that we have,” the whistleblower testified to lawmakers.

“We left it all behind in Afghanistan; they have it. If they have a contact number, they can trace your precise location. That's precisely what specialized teams did.”

During testimony about whether the Taliban owned necessary encryption, the whistleblower confirmed: “They possess all resources.”

Aftermath of the Information Leak

Initial findings submitted to the committee indicated that at least 49 relatives and colleagues of people concerned by the leak had been executed.

A gag order regarding the leak was enacted in August 2023 and prevented all details about it from public disclosure until recently.

Protective Actions

Due to legal constraints, Person A and the aid group associated with informed Afghan families they were supporting that they had “suspicions that certain devices had been intercepted”.

“We recommended that they relocate where feasible and altered their contact details. Those were the two main details that, if authorities acquired such data, would lead to them being traced,” she said.

Disputed Conclusions

The whistleblower contested that government assessment carried out by a former official had been mistaken to state that the obtaining of the dataset by militant forces was “unlikely to substantially change an individual's existing exposure”.

“The thing to remember is that these individuals are not standing up to the Taliban; they are in hiding. Everything boils down to former occupations.”

Person A described terrible violence endured by concerned people, including electrocution, simulated drowning, and physical abuse.

“We have had toddlers who have had bones crushed to try to get relatives to disclose hiding places,” the whistleblower revealed.