🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, the average family spends $27,000 annually for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When including these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid current situation is that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.