🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and revealed new appeals had originated from mediators to restart talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Route

Araghchi is walking a challenging path since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that ended with the US president declaring the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, European countries used their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Representatives asserted repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Iranian officials said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in certain ways if discussions restart.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making faith challenging to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and continues the final answer to address disagreements, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will receive a reply in the identical approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."