Threats, Apprehension and Aspiration as India's financial capital Inhabitants Face the Bulldozers
Over an extended period, coercive communications continued. Initially, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a former defense officer, and then from the police themselves. Ultimately, a local artisan asserts he was summoned to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: remain silent or experience severe repercussions.
Shaikh is among those opposing a high-value initiative where one of India's largest slums – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – faces demolished and redeveloped by a large business group.
"The culture of this area is like nowhere else in the globe," explains the resident. "Yet their intention is to destroy our way of life and prevent our protests."
Dual Worlds
The dank gullies of Dharavi sit in stark contrast to the soaring skyscrapers and Bollywood penthouses that loom over the neighborhood. Residences are assembled randomly and frequently missing basic amenities, informal businesses produce dangerous fumes and the atmosphere is permeated by the overpowering odor of uncovered waste channels.
To some, the vision of a renewed Dharavi into a modern district of high-end towers, neat parks, contemporary malls and residences with multiple bathrooms is an aspirational dream achieved.
"We don't have sufficient health services, paved pathways or drainage and there are no spaces for children to play," explains A Selvin Nadar, fifty-six, who relocated from Tamil Nadu in that period. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and provide modern residences."
Resident Opposition
But others, including Shaikh, are fighting against the redevelopment.
None deny that this community, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is in stark need investment and development. But they worry that this initiative – absent of public consultation – is one that will convert valuable urban land into an elite enclave, forcing out the marginalized, working-class residents who have resided there since the nineteenth century.
This involved these excluded, displaced people who developed the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and economic productivity, whose output is worth between a significant amount and $2m annually, making it among the globe's biggest unofficial markets.
Relocation Worries
Among approximately 1 million inhabitants living in the packed sprawling neighborhood, less than 50% will be eligible for replacement housing in the redevelopment, which is projected to take a significant period to finish. The remainder will be transferred to barren areas and salt plains on the far outskirts of the city, potentially break up a historic social network. Some will receive no homes at all.
People eligible to remain in the area will be given units in multi-story structures, a significant rupture from the organic, shared lifestyle of dwelling and laboring that has sustained the community for generations.
Commercial activities from clothing production to pottery and waste processing are expected to decrease in quantity and be moved to a specific "industrial sector" far from homes.
Survival Challenge
In the case of Shaikh, a workshop owner and multi-generational of his family to reside in this community, the redevelopment presents an existential threat. His makeshift, multi-level facility makes garments – formal jackets, suede trenches, decorated jackets – distributed in luxury boutiques in the city's affluent areas and abroad.
His family dwells in the accommodations below and employees and tailors – laborers from different regions – also sleep there, enabling him to afford their labour. Beyond the slum, accommodation prices are typically 10 times more expensive for minimal space.
Threats and Warning
In the government offices nearby, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project depicts a contrasting outlook. Slickly dressed inhabitants gather on two-wheelers and eco-friendly transport, buying international bread and breakfast items and having coffee on a patio adjacent to a restaurant and treat station. It is a world away from the 20-rupee idli sambar first meal and budget beverage that supports local residents.
"This isn't development for residents," says the protester. "It's a huge land development that will make it unaffordable for residents to remain."
Additionally, there exists concern of the corporate group. Managed by an influential industrialist – one of India's most powerful and an associate of the government head – the corporation has faced accusations of crony capitalism and ethical concerns, which it denies.
Even as local authorities calls it a partnership, the business group paid a significant amount for its majority share. A lawsuit claiming that the project was improperly granted to the business group is being considered in India's supreme court.
Continued Intimidation
Since they began to publicly resist the project, protesters and community members claim they have been experienced an extended period of coercion and warning – involving messages, explicit warnings and suggestions that opposing the project was tantamount to speaking against the country – by figures they claim work for the business conglomerate.
Included in these accused of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c