🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". Legislation may be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," commented a leading MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, support built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation set up by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after viewing harmful online content argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, legislation is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from Europe and the US, other states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this global debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.